Sunrise…sunset.

On at sunset…off at sunrise. To first order, that’s all I wanted. A simple device that turns all my outside lights on when it gets dark, and then off again when it gets light outside. That should not be hard…right? That is surely a problem that has been solved before…RIGHT? After all, last time I checked, it got dark at nightime and light in the morning most everywhere in the world. So I’m betting a LOT of folks would love to make their homes more welcoming and safe, not to mention save a ton on energy costs by never, ever leaving their lights on again.

Yes, surely, this problem already has a cheap, simple, and robust solution. Right?

WRONG!

I know it’s hard to believe, but for some unGodly reason, there seems to be NO simple and effective solution to turn a multiplicity of built-in lights [uh...that means those with actual wall switches and not simply a plugged in lamp] on when it gets dark outside and off when it gets light outside.

I’m kind of a home automation enthusiast, so I know what I’m talking about. I’ve had several homes, and in each one I’ve installed many different types of home-automation lighting controls. I started with X-10, an antiquated power-line control scheme, and then went to Smarthome’s Insteon system when it came out promising better control and robustness. In general, any type of retrofitted automation scheme has it’s drawbacks, but all of them can be made to work…if you know what you are doing…and if you avoid practicing What Not to Do. Apparently, this last piece is a lot harder than you would think!

Now, before you all write in and yell at me, claiming “Hey Tom…there are TONS of sunrise/sunset controllers out there…” hear me out. Yes, there are controllers that will allow you to control ONE switch, which will set you back $20-30 per switch and not offer any other features. Or, there are extremely complicated and totally non-robust boxes you can hook up to your computer. These require a ton of patience [since they rarely work well if at all] as well as an always-on computer you can dedicate to home automation.

So if you want to control multiple, built-in lights, this is what the “experts” recommend:

1. Buy our box [price = approx $70].

2. Buy the software to control our box [price = approx $160].

3. Dedicate a computer that needs to be on 24/7/365 [price = more aggravation than cost].

So instead of creating a great, simple solution, the only way to control your outside lights properly is to spend somewhere around $230, dedicate a computer, and muck around with buggy software and non-robust hardware for the rest of your life…

I guess the single most frustrating part of all this is that NONE of these solutions actually senses light..they all rely upon a-priori knowledge. They require you to tell them where you are in the world and what time it is. Then they run an algorithm that tells them if it’s dark or light outside, depending upon known sunrise/sunset times for your latitude and longitude. Yes, it works, but it seems like overkill just to tell if the sun is shining or not. They are overly complicated. They are prone to breakdowns. You end up baby-sitting them constantly. You might as well simply turn the damn lights on yourself.

…all of this just to get your lights to turn on at dusk and off at dawn.

It seems to me, the simplest and most robust solution is simply a box which contains a photocell that you mount outside your house. When the sun goes down, it senses the lack of light, and turns the lights on. When it comes up, it turns the lights off. This can be accomplished with less than $5 worth of hardware and a little hard work. In fact, a company called Leviton used to offer such a product, but it has long since been discontinued. What I want to know is…why.

Why are home automation controls so hard? Why are we pushed into buying complicated hardware and buggy software when simple and cheap alternatives exist?

This is quintessential What Not to Do.

It may also be a fantastic product opportunity. Hmmm..

4 comments

  1. Phil Gerskovich says:

    As far as I can remember there were futurists who predicted the “Home of the Future” that was full of automation. And in spite of all the technology we have we have made almost no progress. We can’t even control our TV without three controllers. Maybe we really need some kind of artificial intelligence to make set up and management easier.

  2. Tom says:

    Phil,
    Yep…it’s amazing how little progress we’ve made. If half of the effort put in by spammers trying to get content-free comments posted on my sites were put into making real improvements to common problems, we’d all be flying around with jetpacks by now!

  3. Indeed.

    Should be simple; take the light sensor from a yard light (they already have ‘em for a single light) and put it in-line with a relay that controls the power to all your outdoor lights. Have a competent electrician install it in your attic, with the electrical inside and the sensor on a south-facing wall.

    The challenge here is that controlling multiple lights simultaneously requires tapping into the home’s electrical system, and breaking or closing the circuit for all those lights, and only those lights.

    But, if you get a guy in once to run the drops, you’re set.

    Until you move.

  4. Tom says:

    Yeah…as with most things [especially when I'm involved :0], it’s not that simple. Not by a long shot.
    Having an electrician interrupt power to all of your outside light runs would be expensive, and after he was done you could not use your switches for local control. You actually would lose functionality!
    Also, in the interest of making the blog brief, I skipped a few things. *OF COURSE* I would not simply want “On at dusk, off at dawn” functionality. If I’m going to go to all that trouble, that is of course the absolute bare minimum. And, if you are going to spend some bucks, why not get MORE and BETTER functions? So what I really want is:
    1. Default to “on at dusk, off at dawn” if no other info present.
    2. Have an option to turn selected lights off 1, 2, or 4 hours after they turn on to save even more power. This setting may need to change between summer and winter, so it needs to be a simple, easily accessible control.
    3. Have an option to trigger certain lights when “motion” is detected by a motion sensor. The selected lights should stay on for 15 min, and then turn off. They should continue to work in the other modes without change; the motion trigger merely overrides all other functions for the selected lights when active.
    4. Have an option to turn selected lights [or other devices] on or off at preset times, just like dumb timers do [why not?].
    5. Do all of this robustly. That means 100% of the time. Not 60-80% of the time like most power-line controllers typically achieve. Nothing annoys me more than going to all this trouble just to arrive home after dark to find the darn lights are [still] not on!

    OK…stop rolling your eyes…

    Again, NONE of this is hard to do. None of this would be expensive to build and deliver. It is simply a fact that we don’t build products that are easy and cheap unless there is an overwhelming body of evidence that we can make a ton of money doing it. Otherwise, heck with it. That’s my point.

Leave a Reply